Skip to main content

Greenberg

In the midst of a depression or any emotional mean season, the bitterest pill is sometimes not the suffering itself, but the realization that what you're feeling is actually quite ordinary.   You might like to think that you're hurting as few humans have before, that your angst is the result of seeing stupidity or ugliness in the world to which others are blithely unware.  But really, it pains you to realize, you're just swimming upstream in the same chemical tide that might be battering lots of people around you at any given time.

Roger Greenberg (Ben Stiller) is plagued by no such self-awareness. He writes angry letters to Starbucks, American Airlines, even Mayor Bloomberg in New York City as if he's the first person who ever thought of doing so, as if the dark or just annoying forces of the universe have been marshalled against him specifically.   He seems a slightly less sane successor to the bitter, deluded father played by Jeff Daniels in Noah Baumbach's The Squid and the Whale. 

Apparently not long-removed from a mental hospital, Greenberg has come west from the offending NYC to Los Angeles, where he is to house sit for his well-to-do brother, off to Vietnam with most of his family.   It's here that his ornery trajectory and that of Florence (Greta Gerwig) intersect.

Greta is the all-purpose assistant to Roger's brother and family, beloved of parents, children and pet alike.  She's essentially the anti-Greenberg:   young, attentive and all-too-ready to bestow her affection, even where it will find little reciprocation.   As Greta negotiates her way through Los Angeles traffic in the first moments of the film and says "Are you gonna let me in," to car she's eyeing in the rear view mirror, it might as well be a question she's asking of the world in general.  It's a line writ large by Baumbauch but said small (and all the more powerfully) by Gerwig.  



The housesitting stint marks a return to L.A. for Greenberg, where he seemed on the verge of making it big with his band some 15 years previous.  But much to the chagrin of his bandmates, Greenberg turned down a recording contract, which essentially scuttled the group.   Rys Ifans plays Ivan, one the former bandmates, whose good nature has obviously been sorely tested by his relationship with Greenberg over the years, even while he was dealing with his own issues, substance abuse and otherwise.   Ifans shaggy appeal has rarely been put to better or more melancholy use.    

There came a point in Margot at the Wedding,  Baumbauch's previous film, at which the director seemed like a child of the 70's, playing one of those football games that have players magnetized to a metal playing field and moved around by vibration.   Turn the vibration high enough - and I speak from experience - and the players would lose all semblance of a football  game and just crash wildly into each other.  

We had Jack Black being chased by the father of an underage girl with whom he had fooled around and then caterwauling tortuously at his guilt (he might as well have been wailing at the limitations of his range)   If that wasn't enough, Margot and her sister Pauline  (Nicole Kidman and Jennifer Jason Leigh), with children in tow, are sent off on an odyssey which culminates in their wandering lost through the woods and Pauline (Baumbach's wife, no less) shitting herself.   With that, the director lost me, much as he seemed to be enjoying the mayhem to which he was subjecting his charaters.

But in this story that he and Jason Leigh have come up with and Baumbach is credited with writing, there is a plan at work, a method to the madness, even if Greenberg remains clueless to it.   We seem him essentially wandering the frontiers of his sanity.   This happens on the forbidding terrain of a couple of parties, both as he tries to communicate with younger people and then as he skulks the periphery of those gatherings alone.  In both scenes, the conflicting vernaculars and hostility lurking just below the surface of the exchanges are sharply rendered. 

We also see him struggling to be someone competent and trustworthy, out in the elements, trying to keep his peevish brother's pool from overflowing in a rainstorm.  He walks resolutely around his Los Angeles environs in a city that generally scorns pedestrianism.  On a couple of occasions, he finds himself regarding one of those angry-looking, red, flapping, tubular, inflated creatures that businesses like to place out front to draw customers at grand opening or sale times.  None of these scenes are played for laughs.   There's a compassion here that was missing in Margot at the Wedding.   One is made keenly aware of a man that's trying to keep it together in a world that seems full of adversity and ill omens.   During many of these solitary moments we hear the impressively varied score by James Murphy of the LCD Soundsystem take a turn for the discordant, kind of like the sound of jangling nerves.

Just as the film would seem at first blush more of the same from Baumbach, Greenberg looks like a role right up Stiller's alley.   But as the script takes few easy outs, Stiller resorts to almost no jittery trademark mannerism.   He certainly has serious hair:  the graying edges made prominent, parted at the side and brushed away from the sizeable nose and forehead.   He frequently has the look of a man facing a harsh wind that affects him alone.   In one brief scene, he glides through his brother's pool.  Shot in profile, he looks like a wary beast that isn't sure if it should surface into the forbidding world around him.   It's more than an actor shedding some vanity; Stiller commits to the usually unlikable character and makes him real.      

Retreating a couple of steps from the abyss of Margot at the Wedding, Baumbach not only takes pains to demonstrate Greenberg's struggles, but seems to hint at the slightest of growth in him over the course of the 107 minutes of the film.   This modest progress seems to start in the animal kingdom, as he tends to the his brother's family's dog - it's been given the burdensome name Mahler; contrary to the reports of a deficiency of the immune system afflicting the dog, I think if someone had just called the poor thing something reasonable, like Hank or Lucky, he might have perked right up - with increasing sympathy and attention.   And finally, abetted by a small assortment of substances in his system at the second party, he leaves a rambling phone message for Florence, during which he's able to tell her how much he likes her:  one small step for Greenberg, one giant leap for Greenberg-kind.  

I'm not sure that either Greta Gerwig or her Florence are well served by all of this.  Both Baumbach and his main character seem understandably taken with her (them), but Florence is utilized as little more than a lifeline.   For the director, who begins the film in intimate and persistent profile on Gerwig, her ample humanity helps keeps the story afloat above its choppy waters.  To Greenberg, Florence is a chance at redemption, the mid-life attempt at existential do-over to which so many men are prone.  Florence should probably run for her life; Gerwig will hopefully be given more to do in the future.

Greenberg is another in a series Baumbach's men who seem intent on not  going gentle into that good night of maturity.   Stiller, alas, has another of those Focker movies on the way.   But among their respective bodies of work, this one should endure.

db

Comments

  1. You hit on two things that keep sticking in my craw. One is the opening sequence. I agree--Gerwig plays this perfectly. I was completely drawn-in and from that point on, as a viewer, I simply had to "let her in."

    Next was the floppy windsock man--it's a confounding image that's haunting me even as I type this. It's weird, wonderful and whacked. I can almost hear that sound of the wind flapping through that thing and I imagine that's kind of what it's like inside Greenberg's head.

    I don't agree with you when you say, "Florence should probably run for her life." I think the proper way to say it is, "Florence should run for her life." Of course, we all know she won't and whatever hope she might have of becoming a folk singing sensation is going to fall by the wayside as she becomes hopelessly entangled in Greenberg's web of Issues. Or, maybe they're going to combine musical forces and start a band together and live happily ever after? I'm voting for the latter, but expecting the former from Baumbach and that's why I like his movies. They capture what life is like sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, the windsock man. That was one of the points at which I identified with our man Greenberg. I find those things menacing. I don't know why anyone would actually place one of those in front of their business, unless they want to chase people away.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Most Violent Year

The camelhair coat worn by Abel Morales (Oscar Isaac) shines as brilliantly as anything seen in J.C. Chador's A Most Violent Year.  The coat is merely the golden tan of most such garments.  The New York of A Most Violent Year - interior and exterior - pales by comparison.  It's 1981, and a most violent year indeed in and around the great metropolis.  Almost none of  filth of Abel's world - the fuel oil of his business, the frowning elements, dirt kicked up by a vehicle chase - seem to adhere to the impeccable coat.  But as he tries to make a major expansion of his business while attempting to fend off the grip and violence of gangsterism one one side and encroaching law enforcment on the other, the poised, well dressed man is sorely pressed to keep himself clean in the most profound of respects.

A Most Violent Year is a sprawling American story told revealing small.  The canvas is certainly large, even if spread with muted color.  Much of the action of the film takes place…

The King's Speech

“The family has been reduced to the lowest of creatures – we’ve become actors.”  A sad state of affairs indeed, as pronounced by the King of England, George V (Michael Gambon), to his son, Albert (Colin Firth).   The realization proves troubling in more ways than one to the stammering Duke of York .    
The advent of "the wireless," as radio was so quaintly known, meant that it was no longer enough for a monarch or his family to simply look the part and occasionally vouchsafe one of those swively, restrained wave to the masses.   A king or queen would have to speak, ingratiate him or herself to their subjects in their homes, their pubs, their places of work.  This meant that the Duke of York, paralyzed by that stammer since childhood, would be forced into the acting, the theater of public life.    Even worse, the relative safety on which he was counting, playing understudy to his brother, David (as ever, members of the royal family were as weighed down with as much nomenclatu…

The Babadook

"I'll soon take off my funny disguise....And once you see what's underneath...you're going to wish you were dead!"  And hello to you, too!  The rather dire warning comes from "Mr. Babadook" through the agency of a very persistent children's book that bears name of the monster.  Thus, The Babadook, writer and director Jennifer Kent's creepy and assured feature film debut.  Is the Babadook real? Merely a projection, a top-hatted fiend from a children's book that sets off a couple of already febrile minds?  Or perhaps...we have seen the monster and it is us?   
Ms. Kent demonstrates a very sure hand and supple knowledge of film history, the latter manifesting itself in  the action of The Babadook, the film's set design and a particular channel to which the television of Amelia Vannick (Essie Davis) seems permanently tuned, showing everything from the fantastical early cinema of George Melies to the more colorful exploits of Italian horror …