Skip to main content

Youth In Revolt


I’m reminded of the last year or two of my trick or treating career. This was at some point during my junior high years, let’s say seventh or eighth grade. I started getting variations on “my, aren’t you a BIG trick or treater?” The implication, of course, being that it was time to make way for smaller, younger and probably cuter kids. I saw the proverbial writing on the wall and started acquiring my candy the hard way. Do you hear that bell, Michael Cera? It tolls for thee.

Actually, I like Cera. I thought he was often hilarious and touching in Superbad and Juno, smart and sympathetic in Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist. But the window on his doe-eyed, sensitive youth franchise is closing, and Youth and Revolt might just have slammed it shut.

The problem, however, goes way beyond our meek friend, who acquits himself well enough in the double role (although the Francois Dillinger alter ego comes along late enough in the game and is inserted so sporadically as to reveal itself as nothing more than the unimaginative plot device it is). Among other outrages this flimsy, discursive piece of cinematic effluent offers up: Fred Williard shirtless; yet another soundtrack cheaply thick with evocative indie rock and French pop; a facile evocation of Breathless and Jean Paul Belmondo; one of the great American character actors, M. Emmet Walsh, reduced to spreading mashed potatoes all over his face in a scene in which he’s supposed to be tripping on mushrooms (and what, by the way, are all 74 years of Walsh doing playing the father of a teenager?; he looks old enough to be the father of Mary Kay Place, who plays his wife); three separate instances, lest we forget we’re watching something really charming, in which the film lapses into some sort of animation; Fred Williard shirtless.



The problem is really the material. I haven’t read the C.D. Payne book(s) on which this mess is based, but I have had the displeasure of seeing Youth in Revolt. And this level of self-indulgence should begin to be illegal. How many more revisionist high school stories need to be written or filmed in which a sensitive, bookish lad really gets the girl after all? Even worse, the teenage beauty queens after which the heroes of these stories lust are invested with a level of sophistication which vies with the excessive voluptuousness of the ass-kicking heroines of masturbatory comics and video games in its insulting unreality. In Youth in Revolt, Sheeni, the inamorata of young Nick Twisp, fancies all things French, loves Breathless and Belmondo, names an adopted dog Albert (after poor Camus) and corrects Nick when he makes the mistake of expressing his admiration of Tokyo Story by the great Mizoguchi, saying something like “Wasn’t that Ozu?” Are you kidding me? It’s an abusurd and actually mildly amusing exchange, but it also approaches late-career Woody Allen for its detachment from reality.

The film ends with the Cera character being hauled off to juvy for one of the major crimes instigated by the Dillinger persona. The winsome Sheeni promises to wait for him. Nick realizes that maybe he didn’t need the alter ego after all, the real him is good enough. Ugh. Come back Wes Anderson, all is forgiven.


db

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Most Violent Year

The camelhair coat worn by Abel Morales (Oscar Isaac) shines as brilliantly as anything seen in J.C. Chador's A Most Violent Year.  The coat is merely the golden tan of most such garments.  The New York of A Most Violent Year - interior and exterior - pales by comparison.  It's 1981, and a most violent year indeed in and around the great metropolis.  Almost none of  filth of Abel's world - the fuel oil of his business, the frowning elements, dirt kicked up by a vehicle chase - seem to adhere to the impeccable coat.  But as he tries to make a major expansion of his business while attempting to fend off the grip and violence of gangsterism one one side and encroaching law enforcment on the other, the poised, well dressed man is sorely pressed to keep himself clean in the most profound of respects.

A Most Violent Year is a sprawling American story told revealing small.  The canvas is certainly large, even if spread with muted color.  Much of the action of the film takes place…

The Babadook

"I'll soon take off my funny disguise....And once you see what's underneath...you're going to wish you were dead!"  And hello to you, too!  The rather dire warning comes from "Mr. Babadook" through the agency of a very persistent children's book that bears name of the monster.  Thus, The Babadook, writer and director Jennifer Kent's creepy and assured feature film debut.  Is the Babadook real? Merely a projection, a top-hatted fiend from a children's book that sets off a couple of already febrile minds?  Or perhaps...we have seen the monster and it is us?   
Ms. Kent demonstrates a very sure hand and supple knowledge of film history, the latter manifesting itself in  the action of The Babadook, the film's set design and a particular channel to which the television of Amelia Vannick (Essie Davis) seems permanently tuned, showing everything from the fantastical early cinema of George Melies to the more colorful exploits of Italian horror …

The King's Speech

“The family has been reduced to the lowest of creatures – we’ve become actors.”  A sad state of affairs indeed, as pronounced by the King of England, George V (Michael Gambon), to his son, Albert (Colin Firth).   The realization proves troubling in more ways than one to the stammering Duke of York .    
The advent of "the wireless," as radio was so quaintly known, meant that it was no longer enough for a monarch or his family to simply look the part and occasionally vouchsafe one of those swively, restrained wave to the masses.   A king or queen would have to speak, ingratiate him or herself to their subjects in their homes, their pubs, their places of work.  This meant that the Duke of York, paralyzed by that stammer since childhood, would be forced into the acting, the theater of public life.    Even worse, the relative safety on which he was counting, playing understudy to his brother, David (as ever, members of the royal family were as weighed down with as much nomenclatu…